Nationalism in India
"We are Indians and the British are our common enemy." — Mahatma Gandhi
1. Chapter Overview
This chapter traces the INDIAN NATIONAL MOVEMENT from the end of World War I (1918) to the 1930s. Unlike Europe (covered in Chapter 1), Indian nationalism developed in a COLONIAL context — against British rule. Under Mahatma Gandhi's leadership, the movement became a MASS STRUGGLE involving peasants, workers, women, and students.
Key Timeline
| Year | Event |
|---|---|
| 1915 | Gandhi returns to India from South Africa |
| 1918–19 | Post-WWI economic hardship; Rowlatt Act |
| 1919 | Jallianwala Bagh massacre (April 13) |
| 1920–22 | Non-Cooperation Movement |
| 1928 | Simon Commission arrives — boycotted |
| 1930 | Civil Disobedience Movement; Dandi March |
| 1931 | Gandhi-Irwin Pact |
| 1935 | Government of India Act |
| 1942 | Quit India Movement |
2. The First World War and Its Impact (1914–1918)
How WWI Affected India
- Economic hardship: taxes increased, prices doubled (1913–1918)
- Forced recruitment in rural areas — caused widespread anger
- Crop failures (1918–19, 1920–21) → acute food shortages
- Influenza epidemic (1918–19) → 12–13 MILLION Indians died
- Indians began to ask: WHY are we suffering for Britain's war?
The Emerging Nationalism
- Indians fought for the British in WWI with the HOPE of self-government after the war
- Instead: the Rowlatt Act (1919) — draconian powers to arrest without trial
- The hope TURNED INTO anger
3. The Rowlatt Satyagraha (1919)
The Rowlatt Act
- Passed in March 1919
- Allowed the British government to ARREST AND DETAIN any Indian WITHOUT TRIAL
- No right to appeal, no jury
- Indians outraged — 'law that takes away all law'
Gandhi's Response — Satyagraha
- Gandhi called for a NATIONWIDE SATYAGRAHA (non-violent resistance)
- Satyagraha = truth force — non-violent protest through civil disobedience
- Hartals (strikes), demonstrations across India
- Particularly strong in Punjab, where the movement was crushed...
- April 10, 1919: Police in Amritsar fired on a peaceful procession → riots
Jallianwala Bagh Massacre (April 13, 1919)
- Baisakhi day. A peaceful gathering at Jallianwala Bagh, Amritsar
- General Dyer blocked the ONLY exit and ordered TROOPS TO FIRE
- Fired till ammunition exhausted; hundreds killed, thousands wounded
- NATION SHOCKED: British rule revealed as brutal, illegitimate
- Rabindranath Tagore returned his knighthood in protest
- Hunter Commission investigated but Dyer was never meaningfully punished
4. Khilafat and Non-Cooperation Movement (1920–1922)
The Khilafat Issue
- Ottoman Caliph (Khalifa) was the SPIRITUAL HEAD of Sunni Muslims
- After WWI, the British planned to DISMEMBER the Ottoman Empire
- Indian Muslims launched the Khilafat Movement to protect the Caliph
- Leaders: Muhammad Ali, Shaukat Ali
Gandhi's Strategy — Unite Hindus and Muslims
- Gandhi saw the Khilafat issue as an OPPORTUNITY
- Supported the Khilafat Movement — brought Hindus and Muslims TOGETHER
- Combined Khilafat + Non-Cooperation = UNITED MASS MOVEMENT
Non-Cooperation Programme
- BOYCOTT: British schools, colleges, law courts, legislatures, foreign goods
- SURRENDER: titles, honours
- PROMOTE: swadeshi (Indian-made goods), khadi (handspun cloth)
- Non-payment of taxes (in some areas)
Mass Participation
| Group | Why They Joined |
|---|---|
| Peasants | Against high taxes, forced labour (begar) |
| Tribals | Against forest restrictions |
| Plantation workers | Against confinement to plantations (Inland Emigration Act) |
| Students | Boycotted British schools |
| Lawyers | Gave up legal practice |
| Traders | Boycotted foreign goods |
The Movement in Towns and Countryside
- Towns: Boycott of foreign cloth, picketing of liquor shops, bonfires of foreign goods
- Countryside (Awadh): Baba Ramchandra led peasant revolt against talukdars and landlords. Jawaharlal Nehru travelled villages — listened to peasants
- Gudem Hills (Andhra Pradesh): Alluri Sitarama Raju led tribal revolt against forest laws — claimed he had 'special powers'
- Assam Plantations: Workers left plantations thinking Gandhi Raj had come and they were FREE
Chauri Chaura and Withdrawal (February 1922)
- At Chauri Chaura (UP), a peaceful protest turned VIOLENT
- The crowd set fire to a POLICE STATION — 22 policemen killed
- Gandhi was SHOCKED — he believed the movement was not ready for non-violence
- He WITHDREW the Non-Cooperation Movement (February 1922)
- Many leaders (including Nehru, Subhas Bose) were DISAPPOINTED
- Gandhi arrested; sentenced to 6 years
5. Towards Civil Disobedience (1922–1930)
The Lull
- After Non-Cooperation withdrawal, the movement LOST momentum
- Some leaders (C.R. Das, Motilal Nehru) formed the Swaraj Party to enter councils and OPPOSE from within
- Younger leaders (Jawaharlal Nehru, Subhas Chandra Bose) wanted MORE RADICAL action
Factors Leading to Civil Disobedience
- Simon Commission (1928): All-BRITISH commission to review India's constitution; NO Indian member. Boycotted with slogan 'Simon Go Back'
- Lahore Congress (1929): Jawaharlal Nehru as President; declared PURNA SWARAJ (Complete Independence) as the goal
- January 26, 1930: First 'Independence Day' celebrated — Purna Swaraj pledge taken
- Great Depression (1929): Global economic crisis HIT Indian peasants and workers
6. The Salt March and Civil Disobedience Movement (1930–1934)
Why Salt?
- Salt was consumed by EVERY INDIAN, rich or poor
- The British MONOPOLISED salt production and imposed a TAX on it
- Gandhi's genius: make SALT the symbol of British oppression
- A demand that EVERY Indian understood
The Dandi March (March 12 – April 6, 1930)
- Gandhi and 78 followers walked 240 MILES from Sabarmati Ashram to DANDI (coastal Gujarat)
- 24 days. Thousands joined along the way.
- April 6, 1930: Gandhi picked up a lump of salt at Dandi — BROKE THE SALT LAW
- A symbolic act that TRIGGERED nationwide civil disobedience
The Civil Disobedience Movement Spreads
| Group | Actions |
|---|---|
| General population | Made salt illegally, boycotted foreign cloth |
| Peasants | Refused to pay revenue and chowkidari taxes |
| Village officials | Resigned from posts |
| Forest people | Broke forest laws (grazing, collecting wood) |
| Women | Participated in large numbers — picketing, making salt |
| Students | Boycotted schools |
British Response
- Arrested 90,000+ people
- Lathi charges, firing on peaceful crowds
- Gandhi arrested (May 1930)
- BUT: the movement CONTINUED
Gandhi-Irwin Pact (March 5, 1931)
- Gandhi agreed to SUSPEND Civil Disobedience
- Irwin (Viceroy) agreed to RELEASE political prisoners
- Gandhi attended the Round Table Conference in London (1931)
- The Conference FAILED — no agreement on constitutional reforms
- Gandhi returned disappointed; Civil Disobedience RESUMED
7. Participants in the Movement — Different Visions
The Rich Peasants (UP, Gujarat)
- Who: Patidars (Gujarat), Jats (UP) — producers of commercial crops
- Why: Hit by trade depression, falling prices; wanted REDUCTION IN REVENUE DEMAND
- Problem: When the movement was called off (1931), they felt LET DOWN
The Poor Peasants (All India)
- Who: Landless tenants, small tenants
- Why: Wanted remission of RENT; many wanted NO RENT at all
- Problem: Congress was reluctant to support 'no rent' campaigns — feared alienating rich peasants and landlords who ALSO supported the movement
The Business Class (Industrialists)
- Who: G.D. Birla, Purshottamdas Thakurdas
- Why: Wanted protection against foreign imports; supported swadeshi
- Problem: After Gandhi-Irwin Pact, they were disappointed with Round Table Conference's failure
Industrial Workers (Limited Participation)
- Railway workers, textile mill workers participated
- BUT: Congress did NOT want to alienate industrialists (who funded the movement)
- Workers' participation was LIMITED
Women
- PARTICIPATED IN LARGE NUMBERS — a significant feature of Civil Disobedience
- Picketed liquor shops, made salt, marched in processions
- BUT: Congress leadership did NOT give them decision-making positions
- Gandhi was RELUCTANT about women's full political participation
Dalits ('Untouchables')
- Dr. B.R. Ambedkar demanded: SEPARATE ELECTORATE for Dalits
- Gandhi OPPOSED: a separate electorate would 'DIVIDE HINDU SOCIETY'
- Gandhi went on a FAST UNTO DEATH against separate electorates
- Poona Pact (1932): compromise — RESERVED SEATS for Dalits WITHIN the general electorate (not separate)
- Dalit movement was partly WITHIN the nationalist movement and partly AGAINST its neglect of caste
Muslims
- Participation DECLINED after the withdrawal of Non-Cooperation
- Reasons: Congress's HINDU colouring (cow protection, Hindu religious imagery), failure to address Muslim fears
- Some sections: Alienated from Congress → gravitated toward the Muslim League
- Muhammad Ali Jinnah: 'Two-Nation Theory' gradually took shape
8. The Sense of Collective Belonging
Nationalism is NOT just political movements — it's also CULTURE and IDENTITY. How did Indians come to feel they were ONE NATION?
1. History and Fiction
- Nationalist histories: GLORIFIED India's past — ancient unity, cultural achievements
- Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay: 'Anandamath' (1882); 'Vande Mataram' — became nationalist anthem
- Historical novels about Rajputs, Marathas — created PRIDE in India's past
2. Folklore and Folk Songs
- Rabindranath Tagore collected BALLADS, folk tales, nursery rhymes
- Natesa Sastri: 'Folklore of Southern India' — 4 volumes
- Folk traditions showed INDIA'S UNITY beneath regional diversity
- During Swadeshi movement: tricolour carried everywhere — a visual symbol of the nation
3. Icons and Symbols
- Bharat Mata: Abanindranath Tagore painted Bharat Mata as an ASCETIC — calm, composed, divine. Became a powerful nationalist symbol.
- The Flag: Swadeshi movement popularised the tricolour (red, green, yellow — later saffron, white, green). Carrying the flag MEANT defying the British.
4. Reinterpretation of History
- British histories painted Indians as BACKWARD, divided, incapable of self-rule
- Nationalist historians COUNTERED: India had a GLORIOUS past — achievements in art, architecture, science, literature
- The nationalist narrative UNIFIED Indians around SHARED HERITAGE
9. Key Concepts
Satyagraha
- Gandhi's philosophy of NON-VIOLENT RESISTANCE
- 'Satya' (truth) + 'Agraha' (insistence) = 'Truth Force'
- Not passive — ACTIVE non-violent confrontation with injustice
- Required great COURAGE (not cowardice)
Swaraj
- 'Self-rule' — could mean: (a) political independence OR (b) self-discipline, moral governance
- Gandhi emphasised BOTH
Swadeshi
- 'Of one's own country' — using Indian-made goods
- Boycott of foreign (especially British) goods
- Khadi (handspun cloth) became the SYMBOL of swadeshi
Purna Swaraj
- 'Complete Independence' — adopted as Congress's goal at Lahore (1929)
10. Exam Focus
High-Weightage Topics
- Jallianwala Bagh massacre (1919) — causes, events, impact
- Non-Cooperation Movement (1920–22) — programme, participation, withdrawal (Chauri Chaura)
- Civil Disobedience Movement (1930–34) — Salt March, spread, participation
- Limits of the movement: different groups, different aspirations
- Dalit movement — Ambedkar, separate electorates, Poona Pact
- Sense of collective belonging — cultural processes
- Simon Commission (1928) and Lahore Congress (1929)
Comparison with Europe (Chapter 1)
- Europe: nationalism against MONARCHIES and to CREATE nation-states
- India: nationalism against COLONIAL rule and to RECLAIM a nation
- Both: used culture (history, folklore, symbols, art) to build national identity
11. Common Mistakes
-
Non-Cooperation and Civil Disobedience are the SAME — NO. Non-Cooperation (1920–22) = boycott British institutions. Civil Disobedience (1930–34) = BREAK colonial LAWS (like salt law). Different strategy.
-
The movement was unified everyone was on the same page — NO. Different groups had DIFFERENT aspirations. Peasants wanted land reform. Industrialists wanted protection from imports. Workers wanted better conditions. Dalits wanted caste equality. Muslims wanted safeguards. The 'unity' was FRAGILE.
-
Gandhi withdrew Non-Cooperation because of violence = he was weak — NO. Gandhi's COMMITMENT to non-violence was absolute. For him, VIOLENT means corrupted the END. Whether right or wrong — it was consistent with his principles.
-
Women participated equally — They participated in LARGE NUMBERS but were EXCLUDED from leadership positions. Gandhi was AMBIVALENT about women's political roles.
12. Conclusion
Indian nationalism was a MASS MOVEMENT, not just an elite project:
- GANDHI transformed the freedom struggle into a PEOPLE'S MOVEMENT
- NON-COOPERATION (1920–22): First mass movement — boycotts, swadeshi
- CHOURI CHAURA: Violence led Gandhi to withdraw — controversial but principled
- CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE (1930–34): Salt March — genius symbolism. Breaking colonial laws.
- LIMITS: Dalits, Muslims, workers — not all groups fully included. The nationalist 'unity' had cracks.
For CBSE:
- Chronology and CAUSAL CONNECTIONS: why did one event lead to another?
- PARTICIPATION of different groups — who joined, who didn't, WHY
- The CULTURAL dimension of nationalism (Bharat Mata, folklore, history)
- Gandhi's STRATEGY: Satyagraha as a method, Swaraj as a goal
Indian nationalism — a diverse, contested, but ultimately triumphant struggle for freedom.
