Applications of Derivatives
1. Check this before you revise anything
The chapter's own introduction promises two topics it never delivers. Its opening paragraph lists three uses of the derivative it will cover: "(i) to determine rate of change of quantities, (ii) to find the equations of tangent and normal to a curve at a point, (iii) to find turning points" — and closes with "we use the derivative to find approximate value of certain quantities."
Only rate of change and turning points (maxima/minima, increasing/decreasing) are actually taught. There is no tangent/normal section, and no differentials/approximations section, anywhere in the current book's four actual sections (6.2 Rate of Change, 6.3 Increasing and Decreasing Functions, 6.4 Maxima and Minima).
The old stub taught tangents and normals as a full section with the standard slope formulas — content the current edition's introduction still name-drops but never teaches. Removed entirely from this rebuild, matching the syllabus line itself, which lists only "rate of change of quantities, increasing/decreasing functions, maxima and minima" with nothing about tangents, normals, or approximations.
The old stub also collapsed the chapter's three real exercises into one invented 40-question group with no solutions file behind it. The book has Exercise 6.1 (18 questions, rates of change), Exercise 6.2 (19 questions, increasing/decreasing functions), Exercise 6.3 (29 questions, maxima/minima and optimisation), and a Miscellaneous Exercise (16) — 82 questions in total.
2. What this chapter covers
| Textbook section | Topic |
|---|---|
| 6.2 | Rate of change of quantities — related rates, marginal cost/revenue |
| 6.3 | Increasing and decreasing functions — sign of |
| 6.4 | Maxima and minima — first and second derivative tests, absolute extrema, optimisation |
3. Rate of change and monotonicity
If , then (or ) is the rate of change of with respect to . When two quantities and both vary with a third variable (a related rates problem), the chain rule connects them: .
is increasing on an interval if throughout it, and decreasing if throughout it. The practical test is always the same: differentiate, find where or is undefined (the critical points), and check the sign of on each interval between them.
Reading a rate correctly. evaluated at gives the rate of change of per unit change in at that instant, not an average. A positive value means increases as does; the magnitude says how fast.
The related-rates procedure. These word problems all follow one shape, and writing the steps out explicitly is what earns the method marks:
- Name the variables and identify which rate is given and which is wanted.
- Write a geometric relation connecting the variables (area, volume, Pythagoras).
- Differentiate that relation with respect to , applying the chain rule to every variable.
- Substitute the given values only at this final stage.
Substituting numbers before differentiating is the classic error — it freezes a variable that is still changing, and the derivative of the resulting constant is zero.
Strict versus non-strict. The book uses for strictly increasing and for increasing. A question asking for strict monotonicity wants the open condition, and intervals are normally reported as open intervals for that reason.
Why the sign test works. Between consecutive critical points cannot change sign without passing through zero or a break, so its sign is constant on each such interval. Testing one convenient point per interval therefore settles the whole interval — there is no need to test several.
A worked monotonicity case. For , . Completing the square gives , which is strictly positive for every real . So is strictly increasing on all of , with no critical points at all — a reminder that "find the intervals" sometimes has the answer "everywhere".
4. Maxima and minima
A critical point is a point in the domain where or is not differentiable. The first derivative test: if changes from positive to negative as increases through , then is a local maximum; negative to positive, a local minimum; no sign change, neither.
The second derivative test is faster when it applies: if and , is a local maximum; if , a local minimum; if , the test is inconclusive and you fall back to the first derivative test.
Local versus absolute. A local maximum is only the largest value in some neighbourhood of ; an absolute maximum is the largest over the entire interval under consideration. A local maximum can be smaller than a value the function reaches elsewhere, so the two questions have genuinely different answers and must not be conflated.
Critical points need not be extrema. For , but is neither a maximum nor a minimum — the derivative is positive on both sides, so there is no sign change. This is the "neither" branch of the first derivative test, and it is examined.
When the second derivative test fails. tells you nothing on its own. Both (a minimum at ) and (no extremum at ) have . In that situation you must return to the first derivative test rather than guess.
For absolute (global) extrema on a closed interval : evaluate at every critical point inside and at both endpoints , — the largest of all these values is the absolute maximum, the smallest is the absolute minimum. Endpoints are easy to forget and are exactly where these questions like to hide the actual answer.
Worked, mirroring the textbook's own optimisation technique. A square piece of tin of side 18 cm is made into an open box by cutting a square of side from each corner and folding up the flaps. Volume . Differentiating and setting gives or — but collapses the box to zero volume, since the flaps meet in the middle.
So the real answer is , giving maximum volume . That second, algebraically valid but physically meaningless critical point is the recurring trap in every optimisation question of this type.
Establishing the domain first. In that example the physical constraint is , because the cut cannot be negative and two cuts cannot exceed the side. Writing this down before differentiating makes the rejection of automatic rather than an afterthought.
The general optimisation recipe:
- Draw the situation and name the variable to be optimised.
- Write the quantity as a function of one variable, using a constraint to eliminate any others.
- State the valid domain from the physical setup.
- Differentiate, set to zero, and solve for the critical points.
- Discard those outside the domain, then classify the rest with the first or second derivative test.
- Answer the question that was actually asked — sometimes the dimensions, sometimes the maximum value itself.
Step 2 is where most marks are lost: leaving two variables in the expression makes the differentiation meaningless.
Summary
- connects related rates through the chain rule.
- on an interval means increasing there; means decreasing.
- First derivative test: sign change of around a critical point determines local max/min/neither.
- Second derivative test: is a local max, is a local min, is inconclusive.
- Absolute extrema on : check every interior critical point and both endpoints.
- In optimisation word problems, always discard critical points that fall outside the physically valid range (negative lengths, degenerate shapes) before picking the answer.
- In related-rates problems, differentiate the geometric relation first and substitute the given values only at the end.
- Between consecutive critical points the sign of is constant, so one test point settles each interval.
- A critical point need not be an extremum — at has but no sign change.
- is inconclusive: has a minimum there and has none, so fall back to the first derivative test.
- Local and absolute extrema are different questions; a local maximum can be smaller than the function's value elsewhere.
- In optimisation, reduce to a single variable and state the physical domain before differentiating.
- Tangents, normals, and approximations using differentials are not part of the current edition of this chapter, even though the chapter's own introduction still mentions them — they don't appear in any of its four actual sections.
