NCERT chapters — we haven't confirmed Odisha (BSE)'s prescribed textbook

Several state boards have adopted NCERT books outright and others have not. We won't guess. Check the chapter names against your own textbook, and tell us if they differ.

Find a tutor who teaches this board

By the end of this chapter you'll be able to…

  • 1List and explain the 7 functions of political parties
  • 2Distinguish one-party, two-party, and multi-party systems
  • 3Explain India's multi-party system and its link to social diversity
  • 4Differentiate national and state parties with criteria and examples
  • 5Identify 4 major challenges facing parties and suggest reforms
💡
Why this chapter matters
Functions of parties is a guaranteed 5-mark question. Four challenges facing parties (internal democracy, dynastic, money/muscle, ideological blurring) frequently tested. National vs state party difference and recognition criteria.

Before you start — revise these

A 5-minute refresher here will save you 30 minutes of confusion below.

Political Parties

"In a democracy, political parties are like the wheels of a chariot — without them, the chariot of governance cannot move."

1. Chapter Overview

Political parties are essential to democracy. They CONTEST elections, FORM governments, SHAPE public opinion, and LINK citizens to the state. This chapter covers: what parties DO, party SYSTEMS, India's NATIONAL and STATE parties, and the CHALLENGES facing parties (lack of internal democracy, dynastic succession, money, and the fading ideological differences).


2. Why Do We Need Political Parties?

The Functions of Political Parties

  1. Contest elections: put up candidates
  2. Formulate policies and programmes: manifesto — what the party WILL DO if elected
  3. Make laws: the party in power passes laws in Parliament
  4. Form and run government: winning party forms executive, implements policies
  5. Play the role of OPPOSITION: losing parties criticise, check the government
  6. Shape public opinion: raise issues, mobilise people, hold meetings/rallies
  7. Link citizens to government: provide access to government schemes, grievance redressal

A 'Partisan' vs a 'Non-Partisan'

  • Partisan: a person STRONGLY COMMITTED to a party, group, or cause
  • Political parties are NECESSARILY partisan — they take sides on issues

3. Party Systems

TypeFeaturesExamples
One-party systemOnly ONE party controls government; others banned or not competitiveChina (Communist Party)
Two-party systemTWO major parties compete; power shifts between themUSA (Democrats vs Republicans), UK (Labour vs Conservatives)
Multi-party systemSEVERAL parties compete; coalitions commonINDIA

India's Multi-Party System

  • HUNDREDS of parties — from national to tiny regional
  • Since 1989: mostly COALITION governments at Centre
  • Reflects India's DIVERSITY — many parties = many voices
  • Challenge: instability (coalitions can fall apart). BUT: also ensures MORE REPRESENTATION.

4. National vs State (Regional) Parties

National Party

  • Recognised by the Election Commission of India
  • Criteria: (a) at least 6% votes in 4+ states in Lok Sabha/Assembly elections, OR (b) at least 2% of Lok Sabha seats from 3+ states, OR (c) recognised as state party in 4+ states
  • Present across MULTIPLE states

Major National Parties (2026)

PartySymbolFoundedIdeology
BJPLotus1980Hindutva, cultural nationalism, good governance; party of recent ruling coalitions (NDA)
INC (Congress)Hand1885Secularism, social justice, welfare; oldest party; led freedom struggle
AAPBroom2012Anti-corruption, free services (education, electricity); Delhi and Punjab governments
CPI(M)Hammer, Sickle & Star1964Marxism, workers' rights; strongest in Kerala
BSPElephant1984Dalit (Bahujan) empowerment; founded by Kanshi Ram, led by Mayawati
NPPBook2013Northeast focus; Meghalaya

State (Regional) Parties

  • Strong in ONE or a FEW states
  • Often identity-based: language, caste, religion, region
  • Play crucial role in coalitions
PartyStateExample Issue
DMK, AIADMKTamil NaduDravidian identity
TMCWest BengalBengal pride
SP, BSPUPCaste politics
Shiv Sena, NCPMaharashtraMaratha pride, development
BJDOdishaOdia identity
RJD, JD(U)BiharBackward caste assertion
YSRCP, TDPAndhra PradeshTelugu pride
Akali DalPunjabSikh interests
NC, PDPJ&KKashmir identity

5. Challenges Facing Political Parties

Four Major Challenges

1. LACK OF INTERNAL DEMOCRACY

  • Decisions made by TOP LEADERS — rank-and-file members have NO say
  • 'High command' culture in many parties
  • Leaders don't consult ordinary workers on candidates or policies

2. DYNASTIC SUCCESSION

  • Leaders' FAMILY MEMBERS inherit power
  • Ordinary workers can NEVER reach the top
  • Examples across parties: son/daughter/wife succeeds father/husband
  • REDUCES democratic character of parties

3. MONEY AND MUSCLE POWER

  • Elections are EXPENSIVE — parties nominate RICH candidates
  • Big DONORS expect favours in return (corruption)
  • Some parties give tickets to CRIMINALS — 'muscle power'
  • Poor honest people squeezed out of politics

4. LACK OF MEANINGFUL CHOICE (Ideological Blurring)

  • Over time, parties CONVERGE on policies
  • Earlier: Congress (left-of-centre) vs BJP (right) — clear choice
  • Today: all parties embrace WELFARE, DEVELOPMENT, POPULIST schemes
  • Voters find it HARD to distinguish parties based on IDEOLOGY

How Can Parties Be Reformed?

  • Mandatory INTERNAL ELECTIONS (EC guidelines)
  • Women's reservation WITHIN party organisations (1/3 positions)
  • STATE FUNDING of elections (reduce money influence)
  • Anti-defection law STRENGTHENING
  • Public pressure and awareness

6. Exam Focus

  1. Functions of political parties (list all 7)
  2. Multi-party system — why India has it, merits/demerits
  3. Difference between national and state parties
  4. Major national parties and their symbols/ideologies
  5. Four challenges facing parties
  6. Suggestions for party reform

7. Common Mistakes

  1. State parties are 'small' and unimportant — Many state parties are VERY powerful in their states and CRUCIAL in national coalitions. DMK, TMC, BJD are not 'small' — they're ruling parties in significant states.

  2. Party system is fixed by law — NO. India's multi-party system EVOLVED from its social diversity. It's NOT legally mandated. Any country can shift between systems over time.

  3. National parties are 'national' because they have a presence everywhere — Not exactly. A party is 'national' if it meets specific ELECTION COMMISSION criteria (6% votes in 4+ states, etc.). Some 'national' parties are weak in many states but meet the technical threshold.


8. Conclusion

Political parties are INDISPENSABLE to democracy — but they face SERIOUS CHALLENGES:

  • FUNCTIONS: 7 roles — from contesting elections to shaping public opinion
  • INDIA'S SYSTEM: Multi-party — reflects diversity; coalition era since 1989
  • PARTIES: 6+ national parties, dozens of state parties — regional voices matter
  • CHALLENGES: No internal democracy, dynasties, money/muscle, ideological convergence
  • REFORMS: Internal elections, state funding, women's reservation within parties

For CBSE:

  • Functions (7) — list all with brief explanation
  • Party system: why multi-party in India
  • National vs state parties: recognition criteria + examples
  • Four challenges with explanation

Democracy without strong parties is an engine without wheels. But parties without internal democracy are wheels without an axle — they go nowhere healthy.

Key formulas & results

Everything you need to memorise, in one card. Screenshot this for revision.

7 Functions
(1) Contest elections, (2) Formulate policies, (3) Make laws, (4) Form/run govt, (5) Opposition role, (6) Shape public opinion, (7) Link citizens to govt
Party systems
One-party (China), Two-party (USA, UK), Multi-party (INDIA)
India's system
Multi-party — social diversity + coalition era (since 1989)
National party criteria
6% votes in 4+ states OR 2% LS seats from 3+ states OR state party in 4+ states
ECI recognition
Four challenges
(1) No internal democracy, (2) Dynastic succession, (3) Money & muscle power, (4) Lack of meaningful choice (ideological blurring)
Reforms
Internal elections, women's 1/3 reservation in parties, state funding of elections, anti-defection strengthening
⚠️

Common mistakes & fixes

These are the exact errors that cost students marks in board exams. Read them once, save yourself the trouble.

WATCH OUT
✗ State (regional) parties are small and unimportant
✓ Many state parties are POWERFUL in their states and CRUCIAL in national coalitions. DMK, TMC, BJD, YSRCP are ruling entire states. In coalition politics, regional parties often hold the balance of power.
WATCH OUT
✗ The party system is fixed by law
✓ No. India's multi-party system EVOLVED from its social diversity; it's not legally mandated. Countries can and do shift between systems over time.
WATCH OUT
✗ 'National' party means the party is present everywhere in India
✓ A party is 'national' if it meets specific ECI CRITERIA (vote share in 4+ states, etc.). A party can be 'national' on paper while being very weak in many states. It's a TECHNICAL recognition, not a description of national reach.

NCERT exercises

Every NCERT exercise from this chapter — what it covers and how many questions to expect.

Multiple choice
Multiple choice
Parties, symbols, systems
3
Questions
Short answer
Short answer
Functions, challenges
2
Questions
Long answer
Long answer
Functions or challenges (5 marks)
1
Questions

Practice problems

Work through this chapter's problems as a readiness check — reveal each solution, mark yourself honestly, and get your gap report at the end.

Readiness check

Are you exam-ready for Political Parties?

4 problems from this chapter. Try each one, reveal the worked solution, mark yourself honestly — get your gap report at the end.

4 questions~3 min worth ~20 marks in Odisha (BSE) exams

5-minute revision

The whole chapter, distilled. Read this the night before the exam.

  • •7 functions: contest elections → formulate manifesto → make laws → form govt → opposition → shape opinion → link to citizens
  • •Party systems: one-party (China), two-party (USA/UK), multi-party (INDIA). India's EVOLVED due to diversity.
  • •National party recognition: ECI criteria. Major: BJP (Lotus), INC (Hand), AAP (Broom), CPI(M), BSP (Elephant).
  • •State parties: DMK/AIADMK (TN), TMC (WB), SP (UP), Shiv Sena (Mah), BJD (Odisha), RJD/JD(U) (Bihar).
  • •Coalition era: since 1989. Regional parties gained power → Centre must negotiate with states.
  • •4 Challenges: (1) No internal democracy (high command culture), (2) Dynastic succession, (3) Money & muscle power, (4) Ideological blurring.
  • •Reforms: mandatory internal elections, women's reservation IN party positions, state election funding, stronger anti-defection law.

Odisha (BSE) marks blueprint

Where the marks come from in this chapter — so you can plan your prep.

Typical chapter weightage: Political Science paper = 20 marks. This chapter typically carries 5-7 marks.

Question typeMarks eachTypical countWhat it tests
MCQ / Very Short Answer (1 mark)12Party system identification, National vs State party, function name
Short Answer (3 marks)31Challenges to political parties OR National vs State party distinction
Long Answer (5 marks)517 functions of political parties OR challenges to parties and reforms
Prep strategy
  • 7 functions as a LIST: (1) Contest elections, (2) Formulate policies, (3) Make laws, (4) Form/run govt, (5) Opposition role, (6) Shape public opinion, (7) Link citizens to govt. Memorise in this order — examiners expect the full list.
  • 4 challenges as a TABLE: (1) No internal democracy, (2) Dynastic succession, (3) Money & muscle power, (4) Ideological blurring. Each challenge gets one sentence of explanation and one example.
  • National party criteria: learn one criterion clearly (6% in 4+ states) — the exact number helps you answer MCQs. Common error: thinking national party = big party. AAP is a national party; SP is not.
  • India's multi-party system explanation: always connect it to SOCIAL DIVERSITY — India's linguistic, religious, caste, and regional diversity means no single party can represent everyone. This caused the multi-party system to evolve, not any law.

Where this shows up in the real world

This chapter isn't just an exam topic — it lives in the world around you.

AAP's rise — new party challenging the two-party consensus

Coalition politics and the rise of regional parties (1989–2014)

Electoral bonds controversy — money power in practice

NOTA and voter power — reforming party behaviour from below

Exam strategy

Battle-tested tips from teachers and toppers for this chapter.

1
7 functions question: do NOT write them as one-line labels. Write each as a mini-paragraph: 'Political parties FORMULATE POLICIES. They prepare manifestos...' — one sentence explaining what happens, one sentence on why it matters. Seven such paragraphs = full marks.
2
4 challenges: always match each challenge with its REFORM. Challenge 1 (no internal democracy) → mandatory internal party elections. Challenge 2 (dynasty) → legal cap on family members in leadership. Challenge 3 (money/muscle) → state funding of elections. Challenge 4 (ideology blurring) → stricter anti-defection rules. Pairing challenge + reform shows higher-order thinking.
3
National vs State party: if asked to 'give examples,' write party NAME + SYMBOL + STATE(S). BJP/Lotus/national; DMK/Rising Sun/Tamil Nadu. Symbols are tested in MCQs.
4
India's multi-party system: the one-sentence explanation examiners want is: 'India's multi-party system emerged because its SOCIAL DIVERSITY (of language, religion, caste, and region) cannot be represented by just two parties.' Always connect multi-party system to social diversity.
5
Source-based questions often include a party manifesto extract or a newspaper headline about coalition politics. Identify: what function of parties the source illustrates, and whether it's an example of parties working well or failing their democratic role.

Going beyond the textbook

For olympiad aspirants and curious learners — topics that build on this chapter.

STRETCH
Research Maurice Duverger's 1951 theory that FPTP electoral systems tend toward two-party systems (Duverger's Law) — and why India is a spectacular exception. What specific features of Indian diversity make it a counter-example? How does this help us understand why identical electoral systems produce very different party systems in different countries?
STRETCH
Study 'cartel parties' theory (Katz and Mair, 1995): as major parties become entrenched in government and state resources, they begin to collaborate to keep new parties out — reducing competition rather than increasing it. Evidence: electoral laws designed by existing parties, state funding rules that favour established parties, media access limited to large parties. Does this theory explain Indian party politics? Is AAP's rise a refutation or confirmation of cartel theory?
STRETCH
Compare India's party system with Brazil's — Brazil has 30+ registered parties, extreme fragmentation, and coalition governments of 15+ parties. What makes governance possible (or impossible) in such systems? What is the optimal number of parties for democratic effectiveness? Research George Tsebelis's 'veto players' theory and apply it to India's coalition era.
STRETCH
The nexus between crime and politics: India's 2024 election had 251 MPs (46%) with criminal cases. Research Milan Vaishnav's 'When Crime Pays' — his finding that criminally charged candidates OUTPERFORM clean candidates because voters rationally believe that a candidate who can break the law can also break through bureaucratic inertia to deliver local goods. What does this tell us about the failure of state capacity to deliver basic services? How can you fix the crime-politics nexus without fixing the services-delivery failure that makes 'musclemen' valuable?

Where else this chapter is tested

CBSE board isn't the only one — other exams test this chapter too.

Questions students ask

The real ones — pulled from the Q&A community and tutor sessions.

Two factors: (1) SOCIAL DIVERSITY — India's extraordinary diversity of language, region, religion, and caste means that different communities have different political interests that no two parties can adequately represent. The USA is more culturally homogeneous by comparison. (2) ELECTORAL SYSTEM — India uses First-Past-The-Post (FPTP), which normally favours two-party systems (Duverger's Law). But India's diversity is so great that even FPTP hasn't consolidated into two parties — regional parties dominate their states even if they're small nationally. The USA's FPTP system works differently because parties can internally accommodate diverse coalitions.

Opinions differ sharply. ARGUMENT THAT IT DOES: Dynasty converts public office into family inheritance, denying talented non-dynastic leaders fair competition, reduces the party to the family's political vehicle, and creates a sense that politics is a 'family business' rather than public service. ARGUMENT THAT IT DOESN'T: Voters in a democracy are free to choose whom they want, including the children of popular leaders. 'Dynastic' appeal is just a form of name recognition — voters rationally choose known quantities. Moreover, dynasty exists in democracies worldwide (Kennedys in USA, Gandhis in India, Bhuttos in Pakistan). The test is whether voters freely choose them. The real problem is when INTERNAL PARTY DEMOCRACY is absent — the party can't choose someone other than the dynasty even if it wants to.

The Tenth Schedule (1985) prevents MPs/MLAs from voting against their party's official position under threat of losing their legislative seat ('defection'). Purpose: stop 'aaya ram gaya ram' politics (1967 term for legislators switching parties for money). Problem: it has suppressed individual conscience votes. An MP cannot vote FOR a good opposition bill or AGAINST a bad government bill without risking disqualification. Indian Parliament therefore has very few meaningful 'free votes' on important legislation — conscience voting has been almost eliminated. This enables the 'high command culture' the chapter criticises. The anti-defection law solved one problem (instability) while creating another (legislative democracy without real deliberation).

Chaos. Elections would produce hundreds of independent individuals with no coherent legislative agenda. Forming a government would require negotiating among hundreds of independents — impossible to achieve stable majority. Laws would be made by shifting ad hoc coalitions. Public opinion would be shaped only by rich individuals and media corporations, not by organised political movements. History confirms this: early democracies before modern parties (18th-century Britain, early American republic) functioned through elite patron-client networks that were far LESS democratic and accountable than parties. Parties are imperfect, but they are the only known mechanism for organising democratic choice, government, and accountability at scale.

A POLITICAL PARTY contests elections, seeks to CAPTURE POWER, and governs when successful. A PRESSURE GROUP (interest group) does NOT contest elections — it INFLUENCES parties and governments from outside. Examples: trade unions (INTUC, AITUC), business federations (CII, FICCI), farmers' associations, religious organisations (VHP, Jamaat), environmental groups. Parties aggregate BROAD public interest (theoretically); pressure groups represent SPECIFIC interests. Some pressure groups are so powerful they function like parties (Shiv Sena started as a cultural pressure group before becoming a party). The relationship between parties and pressure groups is one of the chapter's key 'power sharing through political parties and movements' forms.
Verified by the tuition.in editorial team
Last reviewed on 26 May 2026. Written and reviewed by subject-matter experts — read about our process.
Editorial process →
Header Logo