By the end of this chapter you'll be able to…

  • 1State AS 1's rule on the three fundamental assumptions — disclose the departure, never the compliance
  • 2Prepare a cash flow statement by the indirect method, classifying every item correctly and handling the financial-enterprise exception for interest and dividends
  • 3Apply AS 17's three ten per cent tests and the seventy-five per cent completeness rule to identify reportable segments
  • 4Identify related parties under AS 18, including the categories the standard expressly excludes
  • 5Compute basic and diluted EPS, restating comparatives correctly for a bonus issue and applying the adjustment factor for a rights issue
  • 6Decide whether a component qualifies as a discontinuing operation and identify the initial disclosure event
  • 7Apply AS 25's discrete approach to interim costs, seasonal revenue and the interim tax charge
💡
Why this chapter matters in CA Intermediate
These seven standards share one question — what must the reader be told beyond the numbers — and they are where a set of financial statements stops being a set of figures and becomes something a stranger can rely on. AS 3 exists because a company can report handsome profit while running out of cash, and nothing in the profit and loss account will show it coming. AS 18 exists because a transaction with an unrelated party can be presumed at arm's length and one with a related party cannot. The group is also strategically valuable: AS 17, 18, 24 and 25 are short, rule-based and consistently examined, and candidates who prepare them properly collect marks that better-prepared rivals leave on the table.

Presentation and Disclosure Standards

Weightage: Chapter 4 of ICAI's Paper 1 syllabus, roughly 12 marks. Seven standards grouped by one shared question. AS 3 and AS 20 are computational and heavily examined; the rest are disclosure standards that candidates under-prepare precisely because they look easy.

The question this group answers

What must the reader be told, over and above the numbers?

Every standard in this group takes the figures as given and asks what surrounds them. AS 1 asks which policies produced them. AS 3 asks where the cash went, which the profit figure cannot tell you. AS 17 asks how a diversified business's single set of numbers should be broken apart. AS 18 asks which counterparties were not at arm's length. AS 20 asks what the profit means per share. AS 24 asks which parts of the business are being shut. AS 25 asks how an interim period relates to a year.

Two of them — AS 3 and AS 20 — are genuinely computational and produce long questions. The other five produce short ones and are worth disproportionate marks per hour of study, because most candidates skim them.

AS 1 — Disclosure of Accounting Policies

The shortest standard in the group and the most foundational. Its requirement is simple: all significant accounting policies adopted in preparing and presenting financial statements should be disclosed, and they should be disclosed in one place.

Why one place matters. A reader adjusting for a difference in depreciation method needs to find the policy. If policies are scattered through the notes, comparability is nominal rather than real. AS 1 requires them collected, normally as the first note.

What counts as significant is a matter of judgement, but the standard indicates the areas: methods of depreciation and amortisation, valuation of inventories, valuation of investments, treatment of retirement benefits, recognition of profit on long-term contracts, valuation of fixed assets, treatment of contingent liabilities, translation of foreign currency items, treatment of goodwill, and treatment of expenditure during construction.

The three fundamental accounting assumptions are going concern, consistency and accrual. AS 1's treatment of them is elegant and is examined: if these assumptions are followed, no disclosure is required, because they are assumed. If any is not followed, the fact must be disclosed. Disclosure is required only for the departure, never for the compliance.

The three considerations governing selection of policies are prudence, substance over form, and materiality.

Change in policy. Any change that has a material effect must be disclosed, and the amount by which any item is affected by the change should be disclosed to the extent ascertainable. Where the amount is not ascertainable, wholly or in part, that fact should be stated. A change that has no material effect in the current period but is reasonably expected to have one in later periods must also be disclosed in the period of the change.

AS 3 — Cash Flow Statements

The one substantial computational chapter in this group, and worth real time.

Why it exists

Profit is an accrual number. A company can report handsome profit while running out of money — selling on long credit, capitalising costs, holding growing inventory — and a reader looking only at the profit and loss account will not see it coming. The cash flow statement reports the actual movement of cash and cash equivalents, classified so that the reader can see whether cash came from operations, from selling assets, or from borrowing.

Cash comprises cash on hand and demand deposits. Cash equivalents are short-term, highly liquid investments readily convertible into known amounts of cash and subject to an insignificant risk of change in value. An investment normally qualifies only if it has a short maturity of, say, three months or less from the date of acquisition. Equity investments are excluded, except in limited cases such as preference shares acquired shortly before their redemption date.

The three classifications

Operating activities are the principal revenue-producing activities of the enterprise and other activities that are not investing or financing. This is the residual category and the most informative one, because cash from operations is the cash the business generates by doing what it does.

Investing activities are the acquisition and disposal of long-term assets and other investments not included in cash equivalents.

Financing activities are activities that result in changes in the size and composition of the owners' capital and borrowings.

The classification of interest and dividends is examined constantly and is worth fixing precisely, because the standard treats financial enterprises differently from others.

For a financial enterprise, interest paid, interest received and dividends received are all operating, because lending and investing are its business.

For other enterprises, interest paid is financing, interest received and dividends received are investing, and dividends paid are financing. Taxes paid are operating unless they can be specifically identified with investing or financing activities.

Direct and indirect methods

The direct method reports major classes of gross cash receipts and gross cash payments — cash received from customers, cash paid to suppliers, cash paid to employees. It is more informative and less commonly used.

The indirect method starts from net profit before tax and extraordinary items and adjusts it back to cash. The adjustments fall into three families, and knowing the families is what makes the method reliable rather than memorised:

  • Non-cash items charged or credited to profit are added back or deducted: depreciation added, amortisation added, provision for doubtful debts added, profit on sale of a fixed asset deducted, loss on sale added.
  • Items belonging to another activity are removed from operating and shown where they belong: interest paid is added back here and shown under financing, interest and dividend income are deducted here and shown under investing.
  • Changes in working capital are then applied: an increase in a current asset consumes cash and is deducted, a decrease releases cash and is added; an increase in a current liability provides cash and is added, a decrease uses cash and is deducted.

The result is cash generated from operations, from which taxes paid are deducted to give net cash from operating activities.

Points that produce marks

Non-cash transactions are excluded from the statement entirely and disclosed elsewhere. Issuing shares to acquire a business, or converting debentures into equity, moves no cash and does not appear.

Foreign currency cash flows are recorded at the exchange rate at the date of the flow. Unrealised gains and losses on translating cash held in foreign currency are not cash flows, but the effect is reported separately to reconcile opening and closing balances.

Extraordinary items are classified as operating, investing or financing as appropriate and disclosed separately.

AS 17 — Segment Reporting

A diversified group's consolidated numbers can conceal more than they reveal. A conglomerate reporting fifteen per cent margins may be running a thirty per cent business and a loss-making one. AS 17 requires the numbers broken apart.

Business segment is a distinguishable component engaged in providing an individual product or service or a group of related products or services, subject to risks and returns different from those of other business segments.

Geographical segment is a distinguishable component engaged in operations in a particular economic environment, subject to risks and returns different from components operating in other economic environments.

Primary and secondary formats. The dominant source and nature of the enterprise's risks and returns determines which is primary. If risks and returns are affected predominantly by differences in products and services, business segments are primary. If predominantly by operating in different countries, geographical segments are primary. Fuller disclosure is required for the primary format.

The identification thresholds are examined and should be memorised. A segment is a reportable segment if:

  • its revenue from sales to external customers and from transactions with other segments is ten per cent or more of the total revenue of all segments; or
  • its segment result, whether profit or loss, is ten per cent or more in absolute amount of the combined result of all segments in profit or of all segments in loss, whichever is greater in absolute amount; or
  • its segment assets are ten per cent or more of the total assets of all segments.

If total external revenue attributable to reportable segments is less than seventy-five per cent of total enterprise revenue, additional segments must be identified until the seventy-five per cent threshold is reached, even if they fail the ten per cent tests.

A transaction with an unrelated party can be assumed to be at arm's length. A transaction with a related party cannot, and may have been struck on terms no independent party would accept. AS 18's purpose is disclosure, not prohibition — it does not stop related party transactions, it makes them visible.

Related party means parties where one has the ability to control the other or exercise significant influence over the other in making financial or operating decisions.

Control means ownership directly or indirectly of more than one half of the voting power, or control of the composition of the board of directors or corresponding governing body, or a substantial interest in voting power together with the power to direct the financial and operating policies.

Significant influence means participation in the financial or operating policy decisions but not control. A holding of twenty per cent or more of voting power is presumed to give significant influence unless it can be clearly demonstrated otherwise.

Key management personnel are those who have the authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the activities of the reporting enterprise.

Relative, in relation to an individual, means the spouse, son, daughter, brother, sister, father and mother who may be expected to influence, or be influenced by, that individual in dealings with the reporting enterprise.

What is excluded is as examinable as what is included. AS 18 specifically excludes from the definition of related parties: two companies merely because they have a director in common, unless the director can affect the policies of both in their mutual dealings; a single customer, supplier, franchiser, distributor or general agent with whom the enterprise transacts a significant volume of business merely by virtue of the resulting economic dependence; and providers of finance, trade unions, public utilities and government departments in the course of their normal dealings.

Disclosure required where transactions have taken place: the name of the related party, the nature of the relationship, the nature of the transactions, the volume either as an amount or as a proportion, amounts outstanding at the balance sheet date, provisions for doubtful debts from such parties, and amounts written off or written back in respect of debts due from or to related parties. Items of a similar nature may be aggregated unless separate disclosure is necessary to understand the effects.

AS 20 — Earnings Per Share

The second computational standard in this group, and one where the arithmetic is straightforward and the traps are specific.

Basic EPS

The numerator is net profit or loss after tax and after preference dividends, including any attributable tax on those dividends. For cumulative preference shares, the dividend for the period is deducted whether or not it has been declared. For non-cumulative, only the dividend actually declared is deducted. This distinction is examined.

The denominator is a weighted average, weighted by the time the shares were outstanding. Shares issued for cash on 1 October in a year ending 31 March are outstanding for six months and count for half.

Bonus issues, share splits and rights issues are treated differently from cash issues, and this is where marks are won.

A bonus issue or a share split increases the number of shares without increasing resources. There is no new money and therefore no new earning capacity. The shares are treated as if they had been outstanding from the beginning of the earliest period reported, and the EPS of all prior periods presented is restated. Failing to restate comparatives is the classic error.

A rights issue at below market price is a hybrid: partly a genuine issue for cash, partly a bonus. It is handled by computing a theoretical ex-rights fair value per share and deriving an adjustment factor:

Shares outstanding before the rights issue are multiplied by this factor, and prior period EPS is restated.

Diluted EPS

Potential equity shares — convertible debentures, convertible preference shares, options, warrants — may become equity and dilute the existing holders' claim. Diluted EPS reports what EPS would be if they did.

The numerator is adjusted for the after-tax effect of amounts that would no longer be charged: interest on convertible debentures net of tax, dividends on convertible preference shares. The denominator is increased by the weighted average number of shares that would be issued on conversion.

Potential equity shares are included only if they are dilutive — that is, only if including them reduces EPS or increases loss per share. Anti-dilutive potential shares are ignored, and each class must be tested separately in order of dilutive effect, beginning with the most dilutive.

AS 24 — Discontinuing Operations

A reader forecasting future results needs to know which parts of the current results will not recur. AS 24 requires the discontinuing part to be separately visible.

A discontinuing operation is a component of an enterprise that the enterprise, pursuant to a single plan, is disposing of substantially in its entirety, or disposing of piecemeal, or terminating through abandonment; that represents a separate major line of business or geographical area of operations; and that can be distinguished operationally and for financial reporting purposes.

The standard is careful about what does not qualify: gradual or evolutionary phasing out of a product line or class of service, discontinuing several products within an ongoing line of business, shifting production or marketing activities from one location to another, and closing a facility to achieve productivity improvements are all excluded.

The initial disclosure event is the earlier of the enterprise entering into a binding sale agreement for substantially all of the assets attributable to the discontinuing operation, and the board of directors or similar governing body both approving a detailed formal plan for the discontinuance and making an announcement of the plan. Disclosure begins from the period in which the initial disclosure event occurs.

AS 25 — Interim Financial Reporting

An interim period is part of a year, and the central question is whether it should be measured as a standalone period or as a portion of the annual period.

AS 25 adopts the discrete approach in principle: measurements for interim reporting purposes should be made on a year-to-date basis, so that the frequency of an enterprise's reporting does not affect the measurement of its annual results. The practical consequences are examined:

  • A cost that does not meet the definition of an asset at the end of an interim period is not deferred merely because it is expected to benefit later interim periods.
  • Income tax expense is recognised in each interim period based on the best estimate of the weighted average annual income tax rate expected for the full year.
  • A seasonal business does not smooth its revenue across interim periods; revenue received seasonally is recognised when it occurs.

Minimum components of an interim financial report are a condensed balance sheet, a condensed statement of profit and loss, a condensed cash flow statement, and selected explanatory notes.

Key formulas & results

Everything to memorise for the exam hall, in one card. Screenshot this for revision.

Basic EPS = net profit attributable to equity shareholders / weighted average number of equity shares outstanding
Numerator for basic EPS = profit after tax less preference dividend (cumulative: whether or not declared; non-cumulative: only if declared)
Rights issue adjustment factor = fair value per share immediately before exercise / theoretical ex-rights fair value per share
Theoretical ex-rights fair value = (fair value of all shares before exercise + proceeds from exercise) / number of shares after exercise
Diluted EPS = (adjusted profit + after-tax interest saved + preference dividend saved) / (weighted average shares + potential shares on conversion)
Indirect method: net profit before tax and extraordinary items, plus non-cash charges, minus non-operating income, plus or minus working capital changes, minus taxes paid
AS 17 reportability: segment revenue, or absolute segment result, or segment assets is 10% or more of the respective total; plus the 75% external revenue completeness rule
AS 18 significant influence presumed at 20% or more of voting power unless clearly demonstrated otherwise
⚠️

Traps CA Intermediate sets — and how to dodge them

These are the exact option-traps and misreads that cost marks under negative marking.

WATCH OUT
Failing to restate prior period EPS after a bonus issue or share split, which is the single most common AS 20 error
WATCH OUT
Treating a rights issue as an ordinary cash issue and skipping the adjustment factor, when a below-market rights issue is part bonus and part cash issue
WATCH OUT
Deducting preference dividend only when declared in the case of cumulative preference shares; for cumulative shares it is deducted whether declared or not
WATCH OUT
Including anti-dilutive potential shares in diluted EPS; only dilutive potential shares are included, tested class by class
WATCH OUT
Classifying interest paid as operating for a manufacturing company; for non-financial enterprises interest paid is financing
WATCH OUT
Including non-cash transactions such as a share-for-share acquisition or a debenture conversion in the cash flow statement
WATCH OUT
Applying the AS 17 ten per cent result test to combined profit and loss netted off, instead of to the greater in absolute amount of combined profits or combined losses
WATCH OUT
Treating two companies as related parties merely because they share a director, which AS 18 expressly excludes unless the director can affect both companies' policies in their mutual dealings
WATCH OUT
Deferring an interim cost that fails the definition of an asset merely because it will benefit later interim periods

Exam-pattern practice

PYQ-style questions with full solutions. Work through them as a readiness check — mark yourself honestly and get your gap report at the end.

Readiness check

Are you exam-ready for Presentation and Disclosure Standards?

15 problems from this chapter. Try each one, reveal the worked solution, mark yourself honestly — get your gap report at the end.

15 questions~11 min

5-minute revision

The whole chapter, distilled. Read this the night before the exam.

  • AS 1: disclose the departure from a fundamental assumption, never the compliance; policies collected in one place
  • AS 3 non-financial enterprise: interest paid financing, interest and dividends received investing, dividends paid financing, tax operating
  • AS 3 financial enterprise: interest paid, interest received and dividends received are all operating
  • Indirect method families: non-cash items, items belonging elsewhere, working capital changes — then deduct tax paid
  • Non-cash transactions are excluded from the cash flow statement and disclosed separately
  • AS 17: three ten per cent tests on revenue, absolute result and assets, plus the seventy-five per cent external revenue completeness rule
  • AS 17 result test uses the greater in absolute amount of combined profits or combined losses, never the net
  • AS 18 excludes shared directors, dominant customers or suppliers, and providers of finance in normal dealings
  • AS 20: cumulative preference dividend deducted whether declared or not; non-cumulative only if declared
  • AS 20: bonus and splits applied from the start of the earliest period with comparatives restated; rights issues need the adjustment factor
  • AS 20: only dilutive potential shares are included, tested class by class from most to least dilutive
  • AS 24 excludes phasing out a product line, relocating production, and closing a facility for productivity
  • AS 24 initial disclosure event is the earlier of a binding sale agreement and board approval plus announcement
  • AS 25 discrete approach: no deferral of a cost that fails the asset definition, no smoothing of seasonal revenue, but tax at the estimated weighted average annual rate

CA Intermediate question blueprint

How this topic is asked, tier by tier — so you can prep to the pattern.

Typical weightage: 12

Exam-hall strategy

Battle-tested tips from mentors and toppers for this topic under the sectional clock.

  1. For a cash flow question, write the three section headings and the standard line items first; the format carries marks even if the last figures do not arrive
  2. State the classification rule before applying it when interest or dividends appear, and say expressly whether the enterprise is a financial enterprise
  3. In AS 17 result questions, compute combined profits and combined losses separately and say which is greater in absolute amount before applying ten per cent
  4. In AS 18 questions, quote the exclusion when an item is excluded; the mark is for knowing the exclusion exists, not for the conclusion
  5. In every AS 20 question involving a bonus or rights issue, restate the comparative and say that you have done so
  6. For AS 24, work through the three limbs of the definition explicitly, then identify the initial disclosure event as the earlier of the two triggers
  7. For AS 25, name the discrete approach and then apply it; the tax exception is the one place it does not govern

Beyond the exam

Where this skill shows up in the job you're competing for — and in life.

Lenders read the cash flow statement before the profit an…

Lenders read the cash flow statement before the profit and loss account, because interest is paid out of cash and a covenant breach shows there first

Segment disclosures are the primary tool analysts use to …

Segment disclosures are the primary tool analysts use to value a conglomerate by parts rather than by a single blended multiple

Related party disclosures are the starting point of every…

Related party disclosures are the starting point of every forensic review of a group, since value is most easily extracted through counterparties the reader cannot identify

Diluted EPS is what an employee holding stock options is …

Diluted EPS is what an employee holding stock options is actually being diluted against, and what an acquirer models when pricing a convertible-laden target

Where else this topic is tested

Prepare once, score in every exam that asks it.

CA Final Paper 1 — Financial Reporting, where Ind AS 7, 108, 24, 33 and 34 extend this material
CMA Intermediate — Corporate Accounting
CS Executive — Corporate and Management Accounting
CFA Level I — Financial Reporting and Analysis, which examines cash flow classification and EPS in the same form

Questions aspirants ask

Pulled from the Q&A community and mentor sessions.

Learn the indirect method thoroughly, because it is the one examinations set and the one companies use, and understand the direct method well enough to describe it and to compute a line or two if asked. The indirect method also teaches something the direct method does not: working through it makes visible exactly why profit and cash differ, which is the whole point of the statement. Learn it as three families of adjustment rather than as a list of items, because a list runs out when an unfamiliar item appears and the families never do.

They carry few marks individually and appear reliably, which is a better bargain than the marks suggest. AS 17, 18, 24 and 25 are short, rule-based and closed — there is a finite list of definitions, thresholds and exclusions, and once you have them a question on any of them is four or five marks earned in six minutes. Compare that with the hours a computational chapter needs for the same marks. Candidates skim these standards because they look easy, and then lose the marks to a question about the exclusions in AS 18 or the initial disclosure event in AS 24, which are precisely the parts a skim misses.

Reason it rather than memorising it. An increase in a current asset means cash has gone into that asset — you sold on credit and are holding a receivable rather than money, or you bought inventory — so cash is lower and the adjustment is a deduction. An increase in a current liability means you have not yet paid — you are holding cash you owe — so cash is higher and the adjustment is an addition. Decreases reverse both. Two seconds of reasoning is more reliable under pressure than a remembered table, and it works for any current item the question invents.

It should never be reported as higher, and if your computation produces that, you have included anti-dilutive potential shares. AS 20 requires potential equity shares to be included only where they are dilutive, meaning only where inclusion reduces earnings per share or increases loss per share. The test is done class by class, ordering classes from most dilutive to least, because dilution is cumulative and a class that looks anti-dilutive against basic EPS can become dilutive once a more dilutive class has been brought in. If every class is anti-dilutive, diluted EPS equals basic EPS.

AS 18 takes no view on whether a transaction should have happened; it is an accounting standard, and its concern is that a reader should be able to see the transaction and judge it. The reasoning is that a transaction with an unrelated party can be presumed to be at arm's length, whereas one with a related party may have been struck on terms no independent party would accept, and the reader cannot make that assessment without knowing the relationship exists. Whether a particular transaction was proper is a question for company law — sections on related party transactions in the Companies Act, 2013, board and shareholder approvals — and for the auditor's reporting responsibilities, both of which sit in Paper 2 and Paper 5 rather than here.
Header Logo