By the end of this chapter you'll be able to…

  • 1State the limit, continuity and differentiability conditions as one question about whether the two sides agree, and about what
  • 2Evaluate limits by substituting first and repairing only genuine indeterminate forms, using factoring, rationalising, inserted ones, standard limits and the sandwich theorem
  • 3Recognise that every standard limit is stated in radians, and adjust when an expression is given in degrees
  • 4Classify a discontinuity as removable, jump or infinite, and say which can be repaired
  • 5Test differentiability from the one-sided derivatives, and distinguish a corner, a cusp and a vertical tangent
  • 6Apply the product, quotient and chain rules, and use implicit and logarithmic differentiation where direct differentiation fails
💡
Why this chapter matters in JEE Main
Everyone knows that sin x over x tends to 1. Change the denominator to the modulus of x and the limit stops existing, because from the right the modulus is x and the ratio tends to plus one while from the left it is minus x and the ratio tends to minus one. Write the numerator in degrees instead and the limit becomes pi over 180, about 0.0175, a number fifty-seven times smaller. Three near-identical expressions, three different fates. What separates them is one question asked with rising strictness: do the two sides agree, and about what? A limit needs them to agree about the value approached. Continuity needs that, and needs the function to actually take the value. Differentiability needs them to agree about the slope. Each condition contains the one before it, which is exactly why differentiability implies continuity and why the reverse arrow fails at every corner, cusp and vertical tangent.

Before you start — revise these

🔗
Domains of expressions involving roots, logarithms and denominators, from Sets, Relations and Functions
🔗
Graphs of the standard families: polynomial, rational, modulus, greatest integer, trigonometric, exponential and logarithmic
🔗
Factorisation and rationalising a surd expression
🔗
Radian measure and the values of the trigonometric functions at the standard angles

Limits, Continuity and Differentiability

Everyone knows that one. Now two expressions that look almost identical.

ExpressionReflexTruth
does not exist

The second fails because the modulus treats the two sides differently. Approaching from the right, and the ratio tends to . From the left, and it tends to . Two answers means no answer.

The third fails because means , so the standard limit returns , a number fifty-seven times smaller than . Every standard limit in this chapter assumes radians.

Do the two sides agree, and about what? That single question, asked three times with rising strictness, is the entire chapter.

LevelThe two sides must agree about
Limitthe value being approached
Continuitythat value, and the function must actually take it
Differentiabilitythe slope

Each condition contains the one before it, which is why differentiability implies continuity and continuity implies a limit, and why neither arrow reverses.

limit only limit only continuous differentiable no value there value at the wrong height slopes -1 and +1 disagree one tangent, so all three hold all four have the same limit; what differs is what else is true

1. Functions, Families and Graphs

Before limits, know the shapes. Most limit questions are answered by recognising the family rather than by manipulation.

FamilyKey feature near a point
Polynomialsmooth everywhere, no exceptions
Rationalbreaks where the denominator vanishes
Moduluscorner wherever the inside changes sign
Greatest integer jump at every integer
Trigonometricperiodic; breaks at odd multiples of
Exponential and log needs a strictly positive argument

The last column is where discontinuities come from. If you can name the family, you can predict where the trouble will be before doing any algebra.

Illustration 1

On what set can possibly be continuous?

Continuity can only be discussed where the function is defined, so find the domain first. Each ingredient imposes its own requirement.

Both requirements hold at once, so intersect them.

On that open interval the function is a quotient of continuous functions with a non-vanishing denominator, so it is continuous throughout, and there is nothing left to check.

The lesson is worth generalising: a function built from continuous pieces by sums, products, quotients and composition is continuous wherever it is defined. Discontinuities appear exactly where the definition breaks down, which is why finding the domain does most of the work.

2. Limits: The Two Sides Agreeing

The value is irrelevant to the limit. A limit describes the approach, not the arrival, which is why a function with a hole at can still have a limit there.

Trap. Wherever a modulus, a greatest-integer function or a piecewise definition appears, check the two sides separately. They are the only situations where the two sides can genuinely differ.

Illustration 2

Evaluate , and explain why the modulus changes the answer.

Split at , because that is exactly where changes its formula.

The two sides give and , so the limit does not exist.

Notice what happened: the numerator is odd and the denominator became even, so the ratio changed sign across zero. Without the modulus both are odd and the ratio is even, which is why approaches the same value from both sides.

3. Evaluating Limits

Substitute first. If the result is a number, that is the limit. Only if it is indeterminate does work begin.

Indeterminate formsTypical repair
factor and cancel, or rationalise, or use a standard limit
divide by the highest power
rationalise or combine into one fraction
use the exponential standard limit

Trap. and are not indeterminate. The first is unbounded and the second is zero, and neither needs any technique.

The standard limits, all in radians, do most of the work.

tan x arc = x sin x radius 1 x sin x is less than x is less than tan x divide through by sin x 1 is less than x / sin x is less than 1 / cos x cos x tends to 1, so the ratio is squeezed to 1 in degrees the arc is pi x / 180, not x so the limit becomes pi / 180, about 0.0175 every standard limit in this chapter is a statement about radians

Illustration 3

Evaluate .

Substituting gives . Two surds separated by a minus sign is the signal to rationalise.

The offending cancelled, which is the whole purpose of the manoeuvre, and substitution is now safe.

Illustration 4

Evaluate .

There is no standard limit for this shape, but there is one for . Manufacture it by subtracting and adding .

Both pieces are now standard, and the algebra of limits allows the split because each piece has a finite limit.

Inserting a that cancels is one of the two most useful moves in limit questions; rationalising is the other.

Illustration 5

Evaluate .

The base tends to and the exponent to infinity, which is the indeterminate form . Reshape it into the standard limit.

Trap. is indeterminate, not . The base is never exactly ; it is approaching while being raised to a power growing without bound, and the two effects compete.

Illustration 6

Evaluate .

The sine has no limit at all as : it oscillates between and infinitely often. So the product rule for limits does not apply.

Bound it instead.

Both outer bounds tend to , so the middle is trapped.

This is the sandwich theorem, and it is the tool for any limit containing a bounded but wildly behaved factor. Note that works the same way, while alone has no limit, since nothing shrinks it.

Algebra of limits

Limits of sums, products and quotients split into limits of the parts, provided each part has a limit and no denominator tends to zero. Illustration 5 shows what happens when that proviso fails.

Limits at infinity

Divide numerator and denominator by the highest power present, then read off which terms survive.

Illustration 7

Evaluate .

Substituting gives . Rationalise, treating the expression as a difference over .

Now divide top and bottom by , the highest power present.

The answer is finite, which the original form gave no hint of. A guess of or would have been equally plausible and both are wrong.

4. Continuity: The Value Attained as Well

Three things must coincide: both one-sided limits and the actual value. Failing any one of them is a discontinuity.

TypeWhat went wrong
Removablelimit exists but is missing or wrong
Jumpthe two sides give different finite values
Infiniteat least one side is unbounded

Illustration 8

Classify the discontinuity of each function at the stated point.

(i) Factor: for the function equals , so both sides approach . The value at is simply undefined, and defining repairs it. Removable.

(ii) As the function tends to , and as to . Nothing can be assigned at to fix this. Infinite.

(iii) From the left the greatest integer is ; from the right it is . Two different finite values. Jump.

Only the first is repairable, and that is what "removable" records. The classification also tells you what a question can ask: removable discontinuities produce "find so that is continuous", and jumps never do.

5. Differentiability: The Slopes Agreeing

The function is differentiable at when the left-hand and right-hand versions of that limit both exist and agree.

cornercuspvertical tangent slopes -1 and +1 y = |x| slopes run to minus and plus infinity y = x^(2/3) both slopes run to plus infinity y = x^(1/3)

Three distinct ways to be continuous and still fail: the slopes may disagree finitely (a corner), or run off in opposite directions (a cusp), or both run off the same way (a vertical tangent). All three are continuous, and none is differentiable.

Illustration 9

Is differentiable at ?

It is certainly continuous there, since and from both sides.

Neither one-sided derivative exists as a finite number, and they head in opposite directions. Not differentiable, and the graph has a cusp: a sharp point with two vertical half-tangents.

Compare , where tends to from both sides. That is a vertical tangent rather than a cusp, and it is still not differentiable, because a derivative must be a finite number.

6. The Implication Chain

Neither arrow reverses, and each reverse failure has a standard witness.

ClaimStatusWitness
differentiable continuoustruea slope needs the graph unbroken
continuous differentiablefalse at
limit exists continuousfalse at

Trap. The chain is quoted backwards more often than any other fact in this unit. Continuity is the weaker condition; differentiability is the stronger one and therefore the one that implies the other.

differentiable the two slopes agree continuous |x| at 0 lives here limit exists a hole lives here each condition is strictly stronger than the one outside it so differentiable implies continuous, and never the reverse

Illustration 10

Let for and . Is differentiable at ? Is continuous there?

Differentiating the formula and substituting is not available, since the formula does not apply at . Use the definition.

by the sandwich theorem, since the sine is bounded. So is differentiable at , with .

Now differentiate away from using the product and chain rules.

As the first term vanishes but oscillates between and for ever, so has no limit at .

Differentiability of says nothing about continuity of . The chain of implications runs between the levels at a point, not between a function and its derivative.

7. Rules of Differentiation

RuleStatement
Sum
Product
Quotient
Chain

Trap. A function built from continuous pieces is continuous wherever it is defined, so finding the domain does most of the work.

Differentiability of says nothing about continuity of : is differentiable everywhere and its derivative is discontinuous at .

The quotient rule's numerator is , and reversing it changes the sign of the whole answer. Remember it as "derivative of the top times the bottom, minus the top times the derivative of the bottom".

Illustration 11

Differentiate .

Three layers, so the chain rule applies twice. Work from the outside inwards, differentiating one layer at a time and multiplying.

The factor of at the end is the derivative of the innermost layer, and dropping it is the standard error. A check: at where the derivative should vanish, and it does.

8. The Standard Derivatives

Implicit differentiation

When is not isolated, differentiate every term with respect to , attaching each time a is differentiated, then solve for .

Illustration 12

Find the slope of at the point .

Solving for is impossible here, which is exactly when implicit differentiation earns its place. The right side needs the product rule.

Collect the derivative terms on one side and factor.

Confirm the point is on the curve first, as an implicit answer is meaningless otherwise: and .

Logarithmic differentiation

Take logarithms first whenever the expression is a long product or quotient, or has a variable in the exponent. Logarithms turn products into sums, which the sum rule then handles.

Illustration 13

Differentiate .

The quotient and product rules together would take half a page. Take logarithms and the structure collapses into three separate terms.

Differentiate both sides, remembering that the left gives by the chain rule.

Every exponent has become a coefficient, which is the whole gain. The method also handles and similar, where no other rule applies at all.

Second derivatives

Differentiate the first derivative again. For implicit or parametric functions, remember that the second differentiation must be carried out by the same rules as the first, so a appearing inside must itself be differentiated.

Summary

One question, asked three times: do the two sides agree, and about what?

A limit needs the two sides to agree about the value approached; is irrelevant to it.

Check the two sides separately wherever a modulus, greatest-integer function or piecewise definition appears. has no limit at for exactly that reason.

Every standard limit assumes radians: in degrees, tends to , not .

Substitute first, and only work if the result is indeterminate. and are not indeterminate.

yields to factoring, rationalising, or inserting a that cancels; to dividing by the highest power; to rationalising; to the exponential standard limit.

The sandwich theorem handles any bounded but oscillating factor, which is why while has no limit.

Continuity needs both one-sided limits and the actual value to coincide. Discontinuities are removable, jump or infinite, and only the first can be repaired.

Differentiability needs the two one-sided derivatives to exist and agree. Corners, cusps and vertical tangents are three distinct ways to be continuous and still fail.

Differentiable implies continuous implies a limit exists, and no arrow reverses. and a factorable hole are the standard witnesses.

The quotient rule's numerator is , and the chain rule multiplies one factor per layer, including the innermost.

Implicit differentiation attaches whenever a is differentiated; check the point lies on the curve before quoting a slope.

Logarithmic differentiation turns long products, quotients and variable exponents into sums, and is the only route for expressions like .

Key formulas & results

Everything to memorise for the exam hall, in one card. Screenshot this for revision.

The organising principle
do the two sides agree, and about what: the value approached, the value attained, or the slope
Three levels of one question. Each condition contains the previous one, which fixes the direction of the implication chain.
Existence of a limit
the limit is L exactly when the left-hand and right-hand limits both equal L
The value f(a) is irrelevant to the limit, which is why a function with a hole can still have one. Check the two sides separately wherever a modulus, greatest-integer function or piecewise rule appears.
Indeterminate forms and their repairs
0/0: factor, rationalise or use a standard limit; infinity over infinity: divide by the highest power; infinity minus infinity: rationalise; 1 to the infinity: use the exponential limit
1/0 and 0/5 are NOT indeterminate. Substitute first, and start work only if the result is genuinely one of these four shapes.
Standard trigonometric limits
sin x over x tends to 1; tan x over x tends to 1; (1 - cos x) over x squared tends to one half
All in RADIANS. In degrees sin x over x tends to pi over 180, about 0.0175, because sin of x degrees means sin of pi x over 180.
Standard exponential and logarithmic limits
(a^x - 1)/x tends to ln a; log(1+x)/x tends to 1; (1 + k/x)^x tends to e^k
For a difference such as (3^x - 2^x)/x, subtract and add 1 to manufacture two standard limits, giving ln 3 minus ln 2.
Sandwich theorem
The tool for any bounded but oscillating factor. x squared times sin(1/x) tends to 0, while sin(1/x) alone has no limit because nothing shrinks it.
Continuity at a point
both one-sided limits and the value f(a) must coincide
A function built from continuous pieces by sums, products, quotients and composition is continuous wherever it is defined, so finding the domain does most of the work.
Types of discontinuity
removable: the limit exists but f(a) is missing or wrong; jump: two different finite sides; infinite: at least one side unbounded
Only removable ones can be repaired, which is why find k so that f is continuous questions are always built on them.
Derivative from first principles
f'(a) = lim as h tends to 0 of [f(a+h) - f(a)]/h
Differentiability needs the left-hand and right-hand versions to exist and agree. Use the definition, not the formula, wherever the formula does not apply at the point itself.
Three ways to fail differentiability
corner: finite unequal slopes; cusp: slopes to plus and minus infinity; vertical tangent: both slopes to plus infinity
The modulus of x, x to the two thirds, and x to the one third at zero. All three are continuous, and none is differentiable, because a derivative must be a finite number.
The implication chain
differentiable implies continuous implies the limit exists, and no arrow reverses
Continuity is the weaker condition. Also, differentiability of f says nothing about continuity of f prime: x squared sin(1/x) is differentiable everywhere with a discontinuous derivative.
Rules of differentiation
(uv)' = u'v + uv'; (u/v)' = (u'v - uv')/v^2; dy/dx = (dy/du)(du/dx)
The quotient numerator is u'v minus uv', and reversing it flips the sign of the answer. The chain rule contributes one factor per layer, including the innermost.
Implicit and logarithmic differentiation
attach dy/dx whenever a y is differentiated; take logs for long products, quotients or variable exponents
For x cubed plus y cubed equals 6xy the slope is (2y - x^2)/(y^2 - 2x), which is -1 at (3,3). Logs turn every exponent into a coefficient and are the only route for x to the power sin x.
⚠️

Traps JEE Main sets — and how to dodge them

These are the exact option-traps and misreads that cost marks under negative marking.

WATCH OUT
Using a standard trigonometric limit on an expression stated in degrees
Sin of x degrees means sin of pi x over 180, so the limit of that over x is pi over 180, about 0.0175, not 1. Convert to radians before quoting any standard limit, and treat a degree symbol in a limit question as a deliberate trap.
Why it happens: The expression looks identical and the degree symbol is easy to overlook.
WATCH OUT
Quoting the implication chain backwards
Differentiability is the stronger condition and implies continuity, because a slope requires the graph to be unbroken. Continuity does not imply differentiability, and the modulus of x at zero is the one-line witness that settles it.
Why it happens: Both properties are met at the same time in most examples, so which implies which never gets tested.
WATCH OUT
Treating 1 to the power infinity as 1
The base is never exactly 1, only approaching it, while the exponent grows without bound, and the two effects compete. Reshape into the standard form: (1 + 3/x) to the 2x is the square of (1 + 3/x) to the x, giving e to the sixth.
Why it happens: One raised to any finite power really is one, and the infinity is easy to read as just a large number.
WATCH OUT
Ignoring the modulus, greatest-integer or piecewise structure and taking a single limit
Those three constructions are the only ones where the two sides can genuinely differ, so they are precisely where you must split. Sin x over the modulus of x has limits plus one and minus one, so the limit does not exist even though the expression looks like a standard one.
Why it happens: The algebra looks the same on both sides until you write it out.
WATCH OUT
Differentiating a piecewise formula at the junction instead of using the definition
At the junction the branch formulas need not apply, so use the one-sided derivative limits directly. For x squared sin(1/x) with value zero at the origin, the definition gives f prime of zero equal to zero, while the differentiated formula has no limit there at all.
Why it happens: Differentiating each branch and comparing usually gives the right answer, so the shortcut becomes a habit.
WATCH OUT
Dropping the innermost factor in the chain rule
Every layer contributes a factor. Differentiating sin cubed of (2x+1) gives three times sin squared, times cos, times 2, and omitting that final 2 halves the answer. Count the layers before starting and check you have that many factors.
Why it happens: The outer layers are visible in the answer and the innermost derivative is often just a constant.

Exam-pattern practice

PYQ-style questions with full solutions. Work through them as a readiness check — mark yourself honestly and get your gap report at the end.

Readiness check

Are you exam-ready for Limits, Continuity and Differentiability?

12 problems from this chapter. Try each one, reveal the worked solution, mark yourself honestly — get your gap report at the end.

12 questions~8 min

5-minute revision

The whole chapter, distilled. Read this the night before the exam.

  • One question at three strictnesses: the value approached, the value attained, the slope
  • f(a) is irrelevant to the limit; a hole still has one
  • Split the two sides at every modulus, greatest-integer function and piecewise junction
  • All standard limits are in radians; degrees introduce a factor of pi over 180
  • Substitute first; work only on 0/0, infinity over infinity, infinity minus infinity and 1 to the infinity
  • Rationalise for surds, divide by the highest power at infinity, insert a 1 that cancels for exponentials
  • Sandwich anything with a bounded oscillating factor
  • Continuity needs both sides and the value to coincide; only removable breaks can be repaired
  • Corner, cusp and vertical tangent are three ways to be continuous and not differentiable
  • Differentiable implies continuous implies a limit exists, and no arrow reverses
  • Quotient numerator is u'v minus uv'; the chain rule gives one factor per layer
  • Take logarithms for long products, quotients and variable exponents

JEE Main question blueprint

How this topic is asked, tier by tier — so you can prep to the pattern.

Typical weightage: 8

Question styleMarks eachTypical countWhat it tests
Evaluating limits31
Continuity and differentiability31
Differentiation techniques21

Exam-hall strategy

Battle-tested tips from mentors and toppers for this topic under the sectional clock.

  1. Substitute before doing anything else. Half the limits in a paper need no technique, and identifying which indeterminate form you actually have decides the method in one step.
  2. Scan for a modulus, a greatest-integer function or a piecewise junction. If any is present, split the two sides immediately, because these are the only places where they can disagree.
  3. Check for a degree symbol in any trigonometric limit. It is a deliberate trap, and the answer differs from the radian one by a factor of pi over 180.
  4. For continuity and differentiability questions on piecewise functions, write the two one-sided conditions as equations and solve them together. Continuity gives one equation and differentiability gives a second, which is exactly what two unknown constants need.
  5. Before differentiating anything long, ask whether logarithms would shorten it. Variable exponents make it compulsory, and products of three or more factors usually make it faster.

Beyond the exam

Where this skill shows up in the job you're competing for — and in life.

Instantaneous velocity

Instantaneous velocity, current and reaction rate are all derivatives, which is why physics and chemistry both depend on the limit that defines them existing at all

Numerical methods and computer graphics rely on continuit…

Numerical methods and computer graphics rely on continuity and differentiability to guarantee that small changes in input produce small changes in output, and a corner in a curve is exactly where a smooth animation visibly breaks

Economics uses one-sided derivatives directly: marginal c…

Economics uses one-sided derivatives directly: marginal cost approached from below and from above differ wherever a firm hits a capacity limit, which is a corner in the cost curve rather than a smooth point

Where else this topic is tested

Prepare once, score in every exam that asks it.

JEE Main
JEE Advanced
CBSE Class 12 Boards
BITSAT
WBJEE

Questions aspirants ask

Pulled from the Q&A community and mentor sessions.

Because a limit describes the approach and not the arrival. The definition asks what the outputs do as the inputs get close to a, and it deliberately excludes x equal to a itself. That exclusion is what makes limits useful: the derivative is a limit of a quotient that is undefined at the very point you care about, so if the value there mattered, calculus could not start. The practical consequence is that a function can have a hole at a and still have a perfectly good limit, and that filling the hole with the wrong number changes continuity without changing the limit at all. When a question gives a piecewise definition with an odd value at one point, check whether the value is being used to break continuity or only to distract.

Substitute first, because roughly half the limits in a paper are answered by substitution alone and no technique is required. If the result is a number, that is the limit. If it is 1/0 or 0/5 the answer is unbounded or zero respectively, and again nothing is needed. Only the four genuine indeterminate forms call for work, and each points to its own repair: 0/0 with polynomials means factor and cancel, 0/0 with surds means rationalise, 0/0 with trigonometric or exponential parts means reshape into a standard limit, infinity over infinity means divide by the highest power, infinity minus infinity means rationalise or combine into one fraction, and 1 to the power infinity means the exponential standard limit. If a bounded oscillating factor is present, none of those apply and the sandwich theorem does.

All three are continuous points where the derivative fails, and they differ in how the one-sided slopes behave. At a corner both one-sided derivatives are finite but unequal, as with the modulus of x at zero, where they are minus one and plus one. At a cusp both run off to infinity in opposite directions, as with x to the two thirds, where the derivative is two over three times the cube root of x and heads to plus infinity from the right and minus infinity from the left, producing a sharp point with two vertical half-tangents. At a vertical tangent both run to infinity the same way, as with x to the one third, so the graph is smooth-looking but the tangent line is vertical. None is differentiable, because a derivative must be a finite number, and JEE options frequently distinguish exactly these three cases.

No, and this is the one place where the implication chain does not extend. The chain relates the three levels at a single point for a single function: differentiable at a implies continuous at a implies the limit exists at a. It says nothing about the derivative as a function in its own right. The standard example is x squared times sin of one over x, with the value zero at the origin. From the definition, f prime of zero is the limit of h times sin of one over h, which the sandwich theorem sends to zero, so the function is differentiable everywhere. Away from zero the derivative is 2x sin(1/x) minus cos(1/x), and the cosine term oscillates for ever as x approaches zero, so the derivative has no limit there. The function is differentiable and its derivative is discontinuous.

In three situations. First, when the variable appears in an exponent, as in x to the power sin x, where no other rule applies at all, because the power rule needs a constant exponent and the exponential rule needs a constant base. Second, when the expression is a long product or quotient, since logarithms turn it into a sum and the sum rule handles each piece separately; a quotient with a square root on top and a cube on the bottom takes three short terms instead of a page of quotient rule. Third, when several factors each need the chain rule, because taking logs turns every exponent into a coefficient and removes most of the nesting. Remember that differentiating the left side gives one over y times dy by dx, and that the final answer must be multiplied back by y, written in terms of x.
Header Logo