The 2014 Bifurcation and its Aftermath — Practice

Question 1

For how long could Hyderabad serve as a common capital for both Telangana and Andhra Pradesh under the 2014 Act?

Accepted Answer

A period not exceeding ten years from the appointed day (2 June 2014), after which it would become Telangana's exclusive capital.

Question 2

What specific status did the Polavaram Irrigation Project receive as part of the Special Package?

Accepted Answer

National Project status, with full central funding.

Question 3

Explain precisely what was promised to Andhra Pradesh in 2014 regarding Special Category Status, what was actually granted, and why this distinction is frequently tested.

Accepted Answer

At bifurcation, the central government indicated Special Category Status would be extended to Andhra Pradesh, reportedly for a period of five years, intended to help the residuary state manage its post-bifurcation fiscal and developmental challenges. The central government subsequently clarified there was no question of granting Special Category Status, on the position that the state had already received a Special Package in lieu of this status, comprising National Project status for Polavaram with full central funding, specified tax concessions, and other financial assistance measures, a substantively different mechanism from Special Category Status itself. This distinction is frequently tested because it is commonly, incorrectly summarised as Andhra Pradesh having received Special Category Status, when the precise, accurate position is that the status itself was promised but not granted, and a distinct, itemised Special Package was offered as an alternative; a candidate stating the imprecise version loses marks for factual inaccuracy on a point the syllabus specifically expects to be stated correctly.

Question 4

Why did residuary Andhra Pradesh need to identify and develop an entirely new capital city after 2014?

Accepted Answer

Hyderabad, the undivided state's established capital, was designated a common capital for both successor states for only up to ten years from the appointed day, after which it would become Telangana's exclusive capital. This fixed, time-bound arrangement meant residuary Andhra Pradesh needed to identify and develop an entirely new capital within this window, rather than retaining any long-term claim to Hyderabad, a genuinely unusual administrative undertaking few Indian states have faced in the post-independence period.

Question 5

Is Amaravati's development as Andhra Pradesh's new capital a completed project? Cite evidence for your answer.

Accepted Answer

No — it remains an ongoing project. Central financial support has continued in subsequent budget cycles, including assistance arranged through multilateral development agencies and direct budgetary allocation, reported around Rs 15,000 crore in the 2024-25 Union Budget cycle with further amounts indicated for future years, evidence that Amaravati's development continues rather than having been completed as a one-time capital-construction project.

Question 6

Beyond losing Hyderabad as a long-term capital, what other kind of loss did residuary Andhra Pradesh face?

Accepted Answer

Hyderabad, as the undivided state's established capital, had concentrated a disproportionate share of the state's own administrative institutions, established businesses, and tax revenue base; residuary Andhra Pradesh, losing exclusive access to this base, faced the practical challenge of building equivalent institutional and revenue capacity in its own, newly designated territory, a challenge distinct from, though related to, the capital-city question itself.

Question 7

In which river region is Amaravati located, and what earlier historical significance does this site carry?

Accepted Answer

The Krishna river region, the same site as the historic Satavahana-era Amaravati Stupa, a major Buddhist centre of ancient India.

Question 8

Explain why this chapter's content is tested across both Paper 2 and Paper 4, and how a candidate should prepare accordingly.

Accepted Answer

The bifurcation itself and its specific provisions are properly historical content (Paper 2), continuing the chronological arc of Andhra Pradesh's own history into the present day, while the Special Category Status dispute, the Special Package's components, and Amaravati's financing are properly economic and fiscal content (Paper 4). A candidate should master this chapter's facts once, then practise applying them flexibly depending on which paper's specific angle, historical sequence or fiscal mechanism, a given question actually asks for, rather than treating the same underlying facts as two entirely separate bodies of content to memorise independently.

Practice — The 2014 Bifurcation and its Aftermath

Sign in to save attempts to your dashboard and track your accuracy over time

Find a verified tutor

Join a live course

Browse coaching centres

About

Categories

Support

Documentation

Get Study Tips & Updates

Download Our App

Download for iOS

Download for Android

Popular Cities