Indian Economy 1950–1990 (Planning and Mixed Economy) — Practice

Question 1

What were the four main objectives of India's Five Year Plans? Which sector did the First and Second Plans prioritise, and what was the key difference in strategy?

Accepted Answer

Four objectives of Five Year Plans: 1. Growth: Increase national income and per capita income through higher output in all sectors. 2. Modernisation: Adopt new technology, modernise agriculture and industry, change social attitudes. 3. Self-reliance: Reduce dependence on foreign aid and imports — produce capital goods and food domestically. 4. Equity: Reduce poverty and income inequality — growth with justice. First Plan (1951–56): Focus on AGRICULTURE — building irrigation infrastructure (Bhakra Nangal dam), land reforms, community development. The plan succeeded (targets exceeded). Second Plan (1956–61): Focus on HEAVY INDUSTRY — the Nehru-Mahalanobis model. Established steel plants (Bhilai with Soviet help, Rourkela with West German help, Durgapur with British help). Invested in power, railways, and capital goods. Key difference: First Plan prioritised food security; Second Plan prioritised industrial self-sufficiency.

Question 2

Explain the Green Revolution — its components, achievements, and two major criticisms.

Accepted Answer

The Green Revolution (late 1960s–1970s) transformed Indian agriculture using: Components: (1) High-Yielding Variety (HYV) seeds — especially for wheat (Dr. Norman Borlaug's varieties) and rice; (2) Chemical fertilisers (urea, DAP); (3) Irrigation infrastructure — tube wells and canals; (4) Pesticides; (5) Agricultural credit to buy inputs. Achievements: (1) Wheat production DOUBLED in Punjab, Haryana, and Western UP — India became self-sufficient in foodgrains and stopped importing food (ended dependence on PL-480 imports from USA); (2) Farm incomes rose; (3) Food security was achieved — India built buffer stocks; (4) Created a prosperous class of farmers in Punjab and Haryana. Major Criticisms: 1. Inequality: The Green Revolution benefited large, irrigated farmers disproportionately. Small and marginal farmers without access to irrigation and credit were left behind — this WORSENED rural inequality. 2. Environmental damage: Chemical fertilisers and excessive groundwater extraction depleted water tables (Punjab now faces a severe water crisis). Soil quality degraded from chemical over-use. Monoculture cropping reduced biodiversity.

Question 3

Critically evaluate India's economic performance from 1950 to 1990. What did planning achieve? What were its failures? Why did the model lead to the 1991 crisis?

Accepted Answer

Achievements of Indian Planning (1950–1990): 1. Industrial base: India built a diversified heavy industrial sector from scratch — steel (SAIL), coal (Coal India), defence (HAL, DRDO), atomic energy (BARC), space (ISRO). This was a fundamental achievement — India had no capital goods industry in 1947. 2. Food self-sufficiency: The Green Revolution (late 1960s) eliminated food imports. India built buffer stocks through FCI. 3. Infrastructure: Roads, power plants, irrigation — substantial expansion from colonial base. 4. Institutions: Reserve Bank of India, banking system, IITs, IIMs — the knowledge and financial infrastructure for a modern economy. 5. Poverty reduction: Despite slow growth, some decline in poverty ratio from ~55% (1973-74). Failures of Planning (1950–1990): 1. 'Hindu Rate of Growth' (~3.5% GDP growth): Compared to South Korea, Taiwan, and China — which grew at 8–10% through outward-looking strategies — India's inward growth was SLOW. Population growth (~2%) consumed much of it. 2. Inefficient public sector: Many PSUs were loss-making, overstaffed, and corrupt. They were kept alive with subsidies — a massive drain on public finances. 3. Licence Raj: Industrial licensing, import controls, and permit requirements bred corruption, discouraged entrepreneurship, and produced low-quality goods with no incentive to innovate. 4. Agriculture neglected post-Green Revolution: Gains concentrated; soil degradation; water crisis. How the model led to the 1991 Crisis: Chronic fiscal deficit (government spending >> revenue) + inefficient PSUs draining the budget + oil price spike (Gulf War 1990-91) + import-substitution leaving India isolated from the global export boom = foreign exchange reserves collapsed to barely 2 weeks of imports. India was forced to pledge gold to the Bank of England for a loan — a national humiliation that made reform politically feasible.

Practice — Indian Economy 1950–1990 (Planning and Mixed Economy)

Sign in to save attempts to your dashboard and track your accuracy over time

Find a verified tutor

Join a live course

Browse coaching centres

About

Categories

Support

Documentation

Get Study Tips & Updates

Download Our App

Download for iOS

Download for Android

Popular Cities